- what the warbler knows
- Posts
- The Portfolio Strategy that broke the ATS black hole
The Portfolio Strategy that broke the ATS black hole
Steve applied to 200 jobs. Zero responses. Then he tried this.
Hey Warblers,
Let me tell you about the most soul-crushing reality in tech right now.
Steve was a senior product manager at a mid-tier startup. Solid experience, good metrics, trying to make a move.
His job search stats after 6 months:
200+ applications sent
4 recruiting emails (all scams)
0 actual human responses
1 existential crisis
"I started wondering if my product launches were just fever dreams," he said.
Then he discovered something that changed everything: The problem isn't your resume. It's that no human ever sees it.
Eight months later, he finally landed a role at a Series B startup. Not through applying. Through being discovered.
Here's exactly how the Portfolio Strategy works in today's wasteland of a job market.
The ATS Reality Check
Steve's awakening came after a particularly depressing week. He'd applied to 47 jobs. Custom cover letters. Tailored resumes. Keywords optimized.
Zero responses.
"I was literally applying to jobs I was overqualified for. Nothing. It was like sending resumes into the void."
Then a friend who worked in recruiting showed him something terrifying: His resume in their ATS system.
It was butchered. His carefully crafted impact metrics were jumbled. Key product launches were missing. The system had parsed his "$50M revenue impact" as "50 revenue."
"That's when I realized - I wasn't competing with other PMs. I was losing to a badly-trained parser."
The Visibility Problem
Here's what actually happens to your application:
ATS scores it (usually poorly)
Auto-rejected if below threshold
Sits in queue with 500+ others
Recruiter spends 6 seconds (if you're lucky)
Rejected because they already have an internal candidate
The game is rigged. So Steve stopped playing it.
The Portfolio Strategy for Getting Seen
Instead of applying, Steve focused on being findable. Here's his framework:
Step 1: Pick Your Portfolio Niche (1 hour)
Don't be a "product manager." Be the "PM who solved X specific problem."
Steve's first attempt was too broad: "B2B SaaS Product Manager" His second was too narrow: "Healthcare Compliance Product Manager for HIPAA-Compliant React Applications"
His final version: "PM who activates B2B users in regulated industries"
Specific enough to be memorable. Broad enough to be valuable.
Here's how he tested it:
Searched the term on LinkedIn - only 3 people used similar language
Checked Google - no direct competition for this positioning
Asked 2 hiring managers - all said it was a real problem they faced
Step 2: Document One Deep Case Study (4 hours)
Not 10 products. ONE. In extreme detail.
Steve almost made a fatal mistake here. His first draft was a boring success story: "We improved activation by 40%."
Nobody cares about your wins. They care about their problems.
His rewrite focused on the mess he inherited:
"The $2.3M Activation Crisis Nobody Talks About"
He wrote about his healthcare app activation project:
The Disaster: 12% activation rate, bleeding $190k/month
The Real Problem: Not UX. Not features. Legal was rejecting 60% of signups.
The Politics: How he got Legal, Product, and Sales aligned (hint: data wasn't enough)
The Research Approach: Skip the surveys. He shadowed customer success for a week.
The Surprising Insights: Users didn't want fewer steps. They wanted clearer compliance indicators.
The MVP That Worked: One feature. Took 2 sprints. Moved activation to 31%.
The Iteration: How they got from 31% to 52% (spoiler: it wasn't what leadership wanted)
Metrics That Matter: Not activation rate. Revenue per activated user.
The Failure: What broke at scale and how he'd fix it now
Published as a LinkedIn article, not a post. 2,847 words. Took him 4 hours to write, 2 hours to edit.
Step 3: The SEO Title Evolution
Steve's title attempts:
(NO) "My Journey as a B2B Product Manager" (narcissistic)
(NO) "Improving User Activation in Healthcare" (boring)
(NO) "The Ultimate Guide to B2B Activation" (overpromising)
(YES) "How to Get 40% Activation in Healthcare B2B: A Product Manager's Playbook"
Why this works:
Recruiters search for "B2B product manager healthcare"
Hiring managers Google "improve B2B activation rate"
It promises to solve a real problem
The number makes it specific and believable
Step 4: Strategic Distribution (The Part Everyone Skips)
LinkedIn Groups (where hiring managers lurk):
Steve didn't just dump his link. He used the "Trojan Horse" method:
B2B Product Management Group (47k members)
Posted a question: "What's your biggest B2B activation challenge?"
Engaged with 20+ responses over 2 days
Then shared his article as "Thanks for the insights, wrote up my experience with this"
Result: 3,400 views, 89 comments
Healthcare Technology Leaders (12k members)
Different angle: "Why traditional activation metrics fail in regulated industries"
Pulled a controversial quote from his article
Started a debate, article link in first comment
Result: 1,200 views, 2 hiring managers DMed him
Product-Led Growth Community (28k members)
Shared one specific tactic from the article
"Try this: Show compliance status during onboarding, not after"
Full article linked at the end
Result: 890 views, invited to their virtual panel
One Industry Forum:
Posted on r/ProductManagement
Title: "I reduced our CAC by $2,100 by fixing activation. AMA"
Answered questions for 3 hours
Dropped article link when people asked for details
Result: Front page, 342 upvotes, article now ranks on Google
Step 5: The Conversion Mechanics (What Actually Gets You Hired)
After distribution, Steve tracked everything. Here's what moved the needle:
The 48-Hour Rule
When someone engaged with his content, Steve had 48 hours to convert them. His system:
Set up Google Alerts for his article title
LinkedIn notifications for article views/comments
Responded to EVERY comment with value, not just "thanks"
The DM Script That Worked
When people viewed his profile after reading: "Saw you checked out my activation article. Happy to share the actual Figma files from that project if helpful for your team. What specific activation challenges are you facing?"
Result: 73% response rate.
The Reverse Interview
Steve stopped interviewing. Instead, he consulted.
Before calls: Research their current activation rate (often public in investor decks)
First 5 minutes: "I noticed your activation seems stuck at X%. Is that still accurate?"
Next 20 minutes: Diagnose their specific problem
Last 5 minutes: "Want me to write up my thoughts on fixing this?"
Why This Works in a Dead Market
I asked three recruiters why Steve's approach succeeded when traditional applications fail:
"We get 500 applications for every PM role. I spend 6 seconds per resume. But when I'm searching for specific experience and find someone who's written about exactly what we need? That person gets 30 minutes of my time."
The brutal truth: The recruiter-outreach era is over.
2019: Recruiters desperately sliding into DMs 2025: Radio silence unless you're famous.
The economics changed:
Layoffs flooded the market with senior talent
Everyone has "10+ years experience"
AI helps anyone optimize resumes
Recruiters are drowning in "qualified" candidates
The Outcome
Week 1-2: Building momentum (views, no responses)
Week 3-4: First recruiter outreach
Week 5-6: 4 companies in pipeline
Week 7: First offer
Week 8: Negotiating between 2 offers
The key: Steve became the asset, not the applicant.
Keep building in public—but make sure the robots can read it.
-Warbler